Category: Uncategorized

Dining with the rapist or #armageddon

Bill Hicks had a fully working bullshit radar. I think he was ahead of his time. I also think his approach illuminated the path that enlightened comedians are stepping into bringing us the news now.

I think it’s dangerous to categorize people in pure categories of black and white, but one way of identifying the wolves is to notice how they whitewash their mistakes and gaslight you into thinking there’s no grey.

Take this, for example:

This bullshit story is uncorroborated by proof, yet 10 months on, the Guardian has still not redacted it or apologised. It’s libel.

If we were to make a start on listing every publication on the subject of Assange from all publications that have knowingly lied, from large organizations like CNN to your local small news outlets bought the world over by Murdoch press, the proceeds from total compensation would be astronomical. And there’d be no Mueller Report.

It’s been 10 years of fabrications.

Yet, every single word published by WikiLeaks is 100% factual because they publish pristine source documents:

“Regardless what you think of Assange…”

Why start an article like that?This is a stock-standard opening phrase for statistically all of the articles in mainstream media that take the anti-extradition view.

It’s shorthand for: ‘despite all the reasons we’ve provided over the last decade for why you shouldn’t care about this (incredible) human/Australian/publisher/prize-winning journalist/father/son (and we’ve deliberately failed to define him in these accurate and humanizing terms for a purpose and we aren’t changing tack now) we have come to realize that his struggle might affect us too. And since we’re too cowardly to admit we spread smears about him that are all unsupported by evidence, we’re nonetheless okay with you continuing to hate this innocent man like we intended, because our bosses are individuals and organizations who make big war profits and they want Assange to provide no input on past and current world issues, as this will severely affect their bottom line if people knew what their votes and tax dollars actually achieve – it might mean they all get sent to the Hague (where they belong), nonetheless even if you do like him, tough: we’re not advocating for his freedom, we are expressly calling him out as separate and it’s our asses we’re protecting’.

Yes, its a very compressed substitution, but it’s a disclaimer that has to go in all the articles, just incase their bosses think they’re running against the main agenda.

What’s the agenda?

Let’s dissect the smears and the whitewashing.

Smear 1: Assange doesn’t bathe.

Rebuttal: how could he? There was no bath in the embassy. He showered. Der.

Fun Fact: the CIA obtained continuous footage from within and without the embassy during Assange’s asylum, even inside the toilets! If you want proof he showered, or want to see Pam Anderson on the toilet, or want to see that infamous shit smear mural Julian apparently made, then ask the CIA. They might help you. Just so as you know – I think that’s creepy, and a violation of privacy, and a violation of human rights.

The CIA has all his belongings too.

“I consider this as theft” – WikiLeaks Editor in Chief Kristinn Hrafnsson:

https://youtu.be/wWR812G9Zxc

Smear 2: …that rapist.

Rebuttal:

I pose for photos with rapists… all the time??? hashtag totally_normal

A person charged of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

  • Notice I said “charged”. Assange is not / has never been charged of rape, nor sexual assault, nor molestation…

The women who are alleged to have alleged sexual misconduct BOTH deny any allegation was made:

  • “AA” tweeted “no, I have not been raped…”.

    Okay, AA so then did you appeal to the public to stop printing misinformation claiming that Julian Assange raped you?

    I’m not for Scientology’s Auditing procedure, but I will make an exception for this individual who, on one hand has publically refuted this allegation against Assange – yet has simultaneously let it ride. I have questions. Firstly, why won’t she speak up? Secondly, did she use her penis heels to break that condom? Because the DNA test showed no penis was ever inside that condom you gave police.

In her youth AA was a “white hat” agent in Cuba, and since her honey trap affair, AA has donned the habit in Zionlandia.

“AA” tweeted: “I have not been raped”.

  • Where are the allegations coming from, if not these women?
  • Is this the reason Sweden refused to proceed with their interview of Assange in London as they interviewed 55 other people in that time, so what was the reason for the delay?
  • Were their alleged victims unable or unprepared to testify that Assange raped them?

The prosecutor in August 2010 said this:

  • Miss “SW”, sweet and innocent Swedish young woman, with a crush on Julian, was swept into this charade in August 2010 after having consensual sex with him, and she has not been seen since. She said that police made it all up, and she burst into tears when they told her they intended on pursuing charges. SW had every photo of Julian ever taken in her Flikr account. She was, like many women then and still, “totally in awe of him”.

WHERE IN THE WORLD IS SOFIA WILEN?

Smear 3: He’s a hacker!

In his youth, which coincided the birth of the internet, Julian was part of a hacktivist group that gained access to the Pentagon and a number of other entities. He was put on a good behaviour bond, paid a small fine, and these charges were expunged. He was then employed by the Australian Federal Police, and used his skills to locate and shut down child sex trafficking rings.

People apply the term “hacker” to him, because it adds to the effort to persecute him.

It’s a smear. You’ve been wanked.

  • The DNC server was NOT HACKED, it was leaked by a whistleblower who saw the primaries had been rigged by the HRC camp.
  • Chelsea Manning, then Bradley, had FULL LEGAL ACCESS to the set of cables that were published (by many other publishers and) WikiLeaks. There was no “hack”. Manning is again being indefinitely detained for refusing to change her testimony.

#freechelsea

NEWS FLASH:

Russiagate is a hoax – WikiLeaks’ disclosures were NOT from Russian sources, DNC Lawsuit against WiliLeaks was thrown out of court – even if the source was Putin, or Satan or Santa Claus – JOURNALISM IS NOT A CRIME

Unpopular opinion: Mueller is not an esteemed figurehead of virtue, he’s a compulsive liar and a “treasonist”.

Proof:

He said there were WMDs. There were not.

Watch: Mueller Liar Pants on Fire

The long-awaited Mueller Report revealed – he’s got nothing.

RT’s Mueller Testimony Compilation – try not to laugh!

Finally, why the World would trust Robert Mueller, of all the dirty dealing Hillary Clinton pawn heads of the FBI, this one in particular can’t speak on corruption involving Russia. I have 2 words:

URANIUM-ONE DEAL

All of the above Governmental acts were whitewashed. We know why they’re after Assange. They want to keep him quiet, and they want us to heed their warning. We have a despotic government.

The FIRST amendment to the American Constitution provides people with the right to publish – yes, even secrets. That’s why the media have been working so hard to convince people Assange is not a journalist. He is, but that’s besides the point. It’s not a special rule that covers journalists, it covers all.

WHO HAS BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS IF ASSANGE DIES NOW?

Read the Room

In 1848, railway worker Phineas Gage received brain trauma from a metal rod that bounced up through his eye and out the top of his head, he survived because the rod cauterterised the tissue on its way through.

The cauterization meant Gage’s brain didn’t fall out like so many bowls of noodles. Although, a chunk of meat was missing from Gage’s prefrontal cortex. Observating Gage following the trauma, Dr Harlow reported that his personality changed. Gage’s missing chunk of white meat taught us that this part of the brain is involved with personality.

Before the accident, Gage was apparently polite and well respected. He was no longer Gage. He was impatient, and rude. But that’s not the full story.

His case is discussed in all cognitive psychology classes. But, did the hot rod turn Gage into a tyrannical beast? All good stories are a little exaggerated.

The truth is, he was quite different in demeanor, he was not polite and he swore, which apparently he didn’t do beforehand, and he was impulsive and uninhibited.

Until this photo was circulated, people imagined he was a dirty misfit.

A moral man, Phineas Gage
Tamping powder down holes for his wage
Blew his special-made probe
Through his left frontal lobe
Now he drinks, swears, and flies in a rage.

Anonymous

The part of this juicy story that’s not often got to in lectures, is that the prefrontal cortex allows us to “read the room”, and with a chunk of it missing, Gage was not integrating the information from his environment that feeds back to inform situational-appropriate behaviour. So maybe he did swear before, but not around select people.

And here’s the kicker. The changes to Gage’s personality were temporary. That’s never discussed. The brain is plastic. Gage rehabilitated, moved to Chile and drove a coach. Someone who is completely unable to plan ahead, delay gratification, get along with others, and work long hours can’t drive a coach in late 19th century Chile.

Firstly, why I’m here.

I’ve had a wordpress account for many years. I haven’t really used it.

I have left both Facebook and Twitter, not necessarily of my own accord.

If I don’t say what’s on my mind, I’ll feel silenced. I have the right to an opinion.

My circle of friends were not all interested in hearing my thoughts on current events relating to Assange this year. I found a tribe of supporters active on Twitter, but there’s been a concerted effort to silence us and close our accounts.

This happened to me three times and now it’s closed permanently.

Each time my following and followed by lists were slashed and were not reinstated. Many pro-Assange accounts have been similarly attacked.

My opinions are my own, if you disagree and want to discuss that I’m open and welcome.

I’d like to present my reasons for why I think the way I do, about WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, his persecution.

My next post will be about why, as a survivor of sexual assault, I would support someone like Julian Assange, who was “accused” of sex crimes in 2010 in Sweden.